Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Quoting%20commentary for Menachot 22:5

וא"ר יצחק בר יוסף א"ר יוחנן מחלוקת בלבונה הבאה עם המנחה אבל בלבונה הבאה בבזיכין דברי הכל שני קמצין בתחילה ושני קמצין בסוף

R'Meir is of the opinion that [the offering is invalid] unless there is present now all the frankincense that was prescribed to be offered with the meal-offering at the outset. R'Judah maintains that the expression 'all'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The expression 'all' is interpreted here, by R. Judah and R. Simeon, in the same sense as the Rabbinic 'anything', 'aughtsoever'. ,t');"><sup>9</sup></span> implies even one grain, and the particle 'eth'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' . Hence there must be left at least two grains.');"><sup>10</sup></span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Menachot 22:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse